Skip to main content

I and Thou





Having read, from my university library, a short, introductory book on Martin Buber by Aubrey Hodes, I decided to read his seminal text, I and Thou, choosing (of two) Walter Kaufmann's translation because I knew his work in philosophy and theology and regarded it with a dual sense of appreciation and skeptical questioning. 

In passing, I note that Kaufmann's translation is the one that most Buber scholars openly (or subtly) devalue. Since I do not know German I cannot come to my own determination but I notice that in this 'devaluation', there is more than a little resistance to seeing Buber's text as iconoclastic when it comes to 'religion' or a 'religious perspective on the world', an iconoclasm that Kaufmann relished, and which, I think, Buber respected. He was, after all, delighted that there was no word for religion in the Hebrew Bible! You get more than a 'whiff' of the followers not wholly appreciating the 'master'!

I remember sitting in a basement room of our library, warmed by a single bar electric fire (as it was an eccentric university) trying to fathom the meaning of Buber's dense yet alluring text. A text that Buber himself confessed was written under the pressure of ecstatic urgency.

Ironically it is a text, as was Buber's life direction, that sets its face against 'ecstasy' in favor of a concrete, embodied presence in the world.

At its heart is an invitation to recognize that we come to the world with a twofold attitude. The one, usually dominant, is to treat the world as a means, a matter of experience and use, and this is necessary. The second is to treat every particular person or subject or object in the world as an end in itself, of a value that touches infinity. This is rarer but ought to be the disposition that enfolds and directs all our meant actions. 

Put like this the book is incredibly simple but it goes forward to explore all the barriers and opportunities for bringing this twofold attitude into the right relationship. It is an invitation to a dialogical relationship with reality that keeps checking against our urgency to use, interpret, and manipulate, a profound question of to what end, in what presence.

For ultimately for Buber, the relationship of I and Thou is a relationship framed by the only reality that can never become an 'It', an object of usefulness, that reality being God. 'I and Thou' ultimate direction is to have one recognize that we live in a transcendental reality where the givenness of everything is not arbitrary or accidental but a gift, continuously created out of a divine ground.

This recognition can never be objectified - made into a 'religion' - for all 'religion' is of the attitude of 'It', a fabrication for our use. 

God is not useful, God simply is and like everything that is, is to be enjoyed as such. 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Buddha meets Christ in embrace

Reading Lama Anagarika Govinda is proving nostalgic on a number of fronts. I recall my first reading of it in my first year at university, bought at Watkins, the famous 'esoteric' bookshop in Cecil Court in London. I sat in my hall of residence room transfixed by a world made familiar; and, it was deepening of a commitment to contemplation (which has been observed fitfully)! I remember returning, at the time, to my school to give a talk to the combined fifth form on Buddhism and using Govinda as the backbone of my delivery (both this book, and his equally wonderful, the Foundations of Tibetan Buddhism). I was voted (I immodestly remember) their best invited speaker of the year. I had even bought a recording of Tibetan music as opener and closer! He reminded me of how important Buddhism was (and is) to my own thinking and comprehension of my experience. The Buddha's First Sermon in the Deer Park was the first religious text I read (of my own volition) at the tender age

Searching for paradise in the hidden Himalayas

At moments of dislocation and intense social uncertainty people will appear offering the possibility of another land where people will be blessed, liberated and genuinely at home. In this case, it was not 'Brexit' but a hidden land of actual immortality, enfolded within the mountain ranges around Mt Kanchenjunga on the Nepalese/Sikkim border. Unlike Shangri-la, Beyul Demoshong was not simply a physical space, carefully hidden (as imagined in Hilton's Lost Horizon) but an occulted place spiritually hidden. The person offering this journey and opening the way to it was the 'crazy lama', Tulshuk Lingpa. Lingpa was a 'terton' a finder of 'terma' which were texts magically hidden until discovered at the right moment for them to be of maximum usefulness to people's spiritual development. They were often hidden by Padmasambhava, the robust wonder-working bringer of Buddhism to Tibet; and, Tibetan Buddhism is alive with such discoveries (though und

Parzival and the neutral angels

Fresh from contemplating 'Lost Christianity', I read Lindsay Clarke's fabulous re-telling of Wolfram von Eschenbach's poem, 'Parzival and the Stone from Heaven' from which 'Christendom' is lost! Von Eschenbach was a sacred poet but one of ecumenical sympathies where not only is Parzival's final battle (unknowingly) with his brother, the piebald Saracen, Feirefiz, essential to his self-discovery but the two of them enter the Grail castle together and are granted together a vision of the 'stone' that is the Grail. When Feirefiz asks whether it is permitted to see this Christian  mystery, Parzival answers (in Clarke's version) yes for, "all Nature's increase is there, so I think that this stone from Heaven must be a living emblem of the earth itself, which is mother and father to us all." There are knights, ladies, sorcerers, hermits and wise old hags abounding in Eschenbach's world but interestingly for a mediev